Casino Royale 1954 Review VideoRecapping 007 #21 - Casino Royale (2006) (Review) The performance on 21st October 8. Even on its own merits, the film offers a small smattering of struggles and thrills, but it's all really small-scale, bland, and not that exciting. This was the Bond title that the producers of the regular series of Bond films begun in dead or live unable to use until the end of the century. All reviewers Verified purchase only All reviewers All casino rama legal age 5 star only 4 star only 3 star only 2 star only 1 star only All positive All critical All stars All formats Format: In a way the adaptation here is more faithful to its source material than many of EON's subsequent adaptations of Fleming's novels. Of course, making Bond American and Leiter English seems awfully stupid for us, but this was made for a pure Spielautomaten mit Freispiel-Boni von Slotozilla - audience, so they just translated the story from a British spy story to an American one. They made Felix Leiter a Brit and renamed him Clarence. Oh and a word of advice, do not purchase the DVD version. Review of Diamonds Are Forever The picture itself, directed by William H Brown Jr. There's also a surprisingly gritty torture sequence at the end, with the bad guys using a pair of pliers on Bond's toes. Either way, he misses Bond by a mile. There seems to be a mix of reviews on different version of this Casino Royale.
Casino royale 1954 review -Als Bond nicht auf Le Chiffres Forderungen eingeht, versucht dieser ihn zu töten, wird aber vom plötzlich auftauchenden Mr. Wenn doch, dann so künstlich und schlecht, dass man es nicht wirklich glaubt. Beitrag Fr Nov 20, Felix Leiter Giancarlo Giannini: Have Your Say Bond's most serious love interest? Während des Kampfes im Treppenhaus fehlt ein kurzer Zwischenschnitt auf die verängstigte Vesper.
Bond dodges the razor blade and finally overcomes Le Chiffre. Review Peter Lorre is superb as the villain Le Chiffre. His toad-like looks and menacing acting make him a great villain.
Michael Pate is annoying but acceptable as Englishman Leiter, and Linda Christian is competent enough as Valerie Mathis, although her looks are taken away from by the black and white.
But what about the first James Bond? Barry Nelson is just about okay. He is handsome and about the right age, and unlike Roger Moore he has at least read the books, although his Americanisation of Bond takes away slightly from Fleming's cold character.
Nelson was born in San Francisco, California on 16th April , and was a regular actor in mid-sized roles on Broadway in the '40s.
So how did he do? Certainly he is credible as Bond, although he lacks flair. He delivers the one-liners sharply, and his interpretation of the role is not too bad, although being an American he will always look out of place.
Nelson's Bond is hard and cold, as should be. He struggles at the fight scenes hardly surprising considering the production was filmed live but he does a reasonable job, with a similar quality of acting to Lazenby.
The picture itself, directed by William H Brown Jr. Obviously the usual special effects are lacking, but overall this is a credible performance of Fleming's book, with good production values and passable performances.
Availability Spy Guise Video now made this amazing and historic program available back in - complete with the restored ending missing from previous video versions.
The added ending restores the final confrontation between Bond and Le Chiffre in which Bond comes out victorious. There is a traditional Bond ending "with a kiss" and then the credits appear.
This deluxe collector's edition also featured many extras: By Arch T 23 on 23 Jan By Heather C on 22 Jun By Sinisteris T on 10 Jun By Albertus A 83 on 23 Nov By Shane F 80 on 30 Oct By Kevin M 1, on 13 Nov By John Eric D on 28 Sep More reviews of this movie.
Review of Goldfinger Review of Diamonds Are Forever Impossible - Rogue Nation Review of Skyfall By Phil Nobile Jr.
Review of Quantum of Solace By John Serba for MLive. Michael Pate is also perfect as a British Leiter, although it would have also been incredibly interesting to see him as Bond.
He is, in essence, what Bond would look like if Flemming had decided to make his character an American and change nothing else.
So too is his scene at the Baccarat table. We can read the distress on his face as he battles LeChiffre with cards, knowing that he must choose between his mission or a woman he loved.
He almost seems to sink into his chair, obviously wishing he were anywhere else, purposely not looking across the table at Valerie lest his feelings compromise the mission.
This particular Casino Royale has to be given a certain amount of leeway as it was a live broadcast. For all involved in believe this is a noble effort.
First off the script: For this hour long broadcast the writers condense the novel quite a bit while retaining elements that can work on the screen.
The change in making James Bond an American for me is less of an issue. The introduction of the characters, how to play baccarat, and the villains scheme are all laid out quite well.
Some of the dialogue really plays well. The audience believes him when he begins to lose in baccarat and then when Valerie is kidnapped and certainly when he is tortured in the bath tub.
Linda Christian does a decent job in the role of Valerie. She is given the weakest lines of the main actors, but her beauty helps the audience forgive that.
Michael Pate is quite good as Leiter. Lastly Peter Lorre is wonderful as Le Chiffre. Lorre seems to take each scene to a different level.
He is quite menacing when he tortures Bond in the bathroom. Overall Casino Royale is a dated movie and has to be watched that way or it cannot be enjoyed.
For a live broadcast it seems to flow rather well. Yes there are moments when it is harder to hear the actors and it seems obvious that the elevators are not real elevators, but in a way that is part of the charm.